https://bit.ly/3NsvEmP https://bit.ly/36V2wnw https://bit.ly/3DiNWCm https://bit.ly/3tPE67C https://bit.ly/3iGPAEm https://bit.ly/3IOpM3L https://bit.ly/3Nvzrj3 https://bit.ly/3ISbOh8 https://bit.ly/3tNX5zJ https://bit.ly/3IQ3hLR

Fact: BDSM allows for bisexual, heterosexual and homosexual groupings. Taken in Hand only caters for those having a preference for M/F relationships with the man in control.

BDSM'ers know that most people..gender and gender preferences notwithstanding, prefer the bottom role. There are far more bottoms than tops in every category. Not in your marriage maybe, but two people is hardly a majority world view.

So which is the more openminded viewpoint? It's pretty obvious.

by a Taken In Hand reader on 2004 Dec 16 - 22:56 | reply to this comment Taken In Hand is not about spanking To my mind, Taken In Hand isn't about spanking. We don't have a spanking relationship (with horse or without!) but my husband is in control.

Karen

by Karen2 on 2004 Dec 16 - 23:03 | reply to this comment Openminded... The anonymous poster said: So which is the more openminded viewpoint? It's pretty obvious. It is indeed.

My husband and I prefer a Taken in Hand style relationship, but we don't claim that our preferences are better or worse than those who are purely into BDSM. The same goes, as far as I can see, for most of the people on this website.


トップ   編集 凍結 差分 バックアップ 添付 複製 名前変更 リロード   新規 一覧 単語検索 最終更新   ヘルプ   最終更新のRSS
Last-modified: 2022-03-29 (火) 23:24:01 (757d)